3D & AR comparison
Meshy vs Adobe Substance 3D
Our pick: Meshy scores 8.7/10 against 8.6/10 for Adobe Substance 3D. Here's how they differ and which one fits your needs.
VS
At a glance
| Meshy | Adobe Substance 3D | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 8.7/10 | 8.6/10 |
| Best for | Game developers, 3D artists, 3D printing hobbyists | 3D artists, Game studios, Product designers |
| Type | Text-to-3D | Textures |
| Pricing | Free plan | Paid |
| Starting price | $20/mo | See website |
| Platforms | Web, API | Windows, Mac |
| Launched | 2023 | 2019 |
Key features
Meshy
- Text-to-3D
- Image-to-3D
- AI texturing
- Auto rigging and animation
- Game engine plugins
- API
Adobe Substance 3D
- Image-to-material
- Text-to-texture (Firefly)
- 3D Painter
- Material library
- Staging and rendering
Meshy: pros and cons
Pros
- Fast, good-quality 3D generation
- Wide export and plugin support
- Free tier available
Cons
- Topology often needs clean-up for production
- Credits consumed quickly
Adobe Substance 3D: pros and cons
Pros
- Industry-standard texturing tools
- Large material library
- AI material creation
Cons
- Professional learning curve
- Subscription pricing
Verdict: Meshy or Adobe Substance 3D?
Choose Meshy if you're game developers or 3d artists or 3d printing hobbyists and value fast, good-quality 3D generation.
Choose Adobe Substance 3D if you're 3d artists or game studios or product designers and value industry-standard texturing tools.
Overall we rate Meshy slightly higher. Both are worth trying, and at least one has a free plan or trial. See all 3D & AR tools for more options.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through links on this page. How we make money.