3D & AR comparison 
Adobe Substance 3D vs Polycam
Our pick: Adobe Substance 3D scores 8.6/10 against 8.2/10 for Polycam. Here's how they differ and which one fits your needs.
Adobe Substance 3D
Pro 3D texturing and materials with AI tools
8.6/10PaidOur pick
Visit Adobe Substance 3D VS
At a glance
| Adobe Substance 3D | Polycam | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 8.6/10 | 8.2/10 |
| Best for | 3D artists, Game studios, Product designers | Real estate professionals, 3D creators, Architects |
| Type | Textures | 3D scenes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan |
| Starting price | See website | Free |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac | iOS, Android, Web |
| Launched | 2019 | 2020 |
Key features
Adobe Substance 3D
- Image-to-material
- Text-to-texture (Firefly)
- 3D Painter
- Material library
- Staging and rendering
Polycam
- Photo and LiDAR scanning
- Gaussian splats
- Floor plans
- AI texture generator
- Exports to many formats
Adobe Substance 3D: pros and cons
Pros
- Industry-standard texturing tools
- Large material library
- AI material creation
Cons
- Professional learning curve
- Subscription pricing
Polycam: pros and cons
Pros
- Excellent mobile capture experience
- Supports many export formats
- Useful for property and spaces
Cons
- Best features need Pro
- Quality depends on capture technique
Verdict: Adobe Substance 3D or Polycam?
Choose Adobe Substance 3D if you're 3d artists or game studios or product designers and value industry-standard texturing tools.
Choose Polycam if you're real estate professionals or 3d creators or architects and value excellent mobile capture experience.
Overall we rate Adobe Substance 3D slightly higher. Both are worth trying, and at least one has a free plan or trial. See all 3D & AR tools for more options.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through links on this page. How we make money.