Coding comparison 
GitHub Copilot vs Cursor
Our pick: Cursor scores 9.4/10 against 9.3/10 for GitHub Copilot. Here's how they differ and which one fits your needs.
GitHub Copilot
AI pair programmer built into GitHub and major editors
9.3/10From $10/mo
Visit GitHub Copilot VS
At a glance
| GitHub Copilot | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 9.3/10 | 9.4/10 |
| Best for | Professional developers, Engineering teams on GitHub | Professional developers, Startups, Vibe coders |
| Type | Code completion | AI IDEs |
| Pricing | Free plan | Free plan |
| Starting price | $10/mo | $20/mo |
| Platforms | VS Code, Web, Mac, Windows, Linux | Mac, Windows, Linux |
| Launched | 2021 | 2023 |
Key features
GitHub Copilot
- Inline completions
- Copilot Chat
- Agent mode
- Coding agent for issues
- PR summaries
- Multi-model choice
Cursor
- Tab autocomplete
- Agent mode
- Codebase indexing
- Background agents
- Bugbot code review
- Rules and memories
GitHub Copilot: pros and cons
Pros
- Deep GitHub integration
- Works in almost every popular IDE
- Free tier for individuals
- Enterprise controls and IP indemnity
Cons
- Premium model requests are metered
- Agent features lag dedicated AI IDEs in some workflows
Cursor: pros and cons
Pros
- Excellent autocomplete quality
- Familiar VS Code experience and extensions
- Strong multi-file refactoring
Cons
- Usage-based limits on heavy agent use
- Pricing changes have frustrated some users
Verdict: GitHub Copilot or Cursor?
Choose GitHub Copilot if you're professional developers or engineering teams on github and value deep GitHub integration.
Choose Cursor if you're professional developers or startups or vibe coders and value excellent autocomplete quality.
Overall we rate Cursor slightly higher. Both are worth trying, and at least one has a free plan or trial. See all Coding tools for more options.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through links on this page. How we make money.