Automation & Agents comparison
n8n vs Make
Our pick: n8n scores 8.9/10 against 8.8/10 for Make. Here's how they differ and which one fits your needs.
VS
At a glance
| n8n | Make | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 8.9/10 | 8.8/10 |
| Best for | Technical teams, Automation builders, Agencies | Agencies, Operations teams, Automation consultants |
| Type | Workflow automation | Workflow automation |
| Pricing | Free plan | Free plan |
| Starting price | Free | $9/mo |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Mac, Windows | Web |
| Launched | 2019 | 2016 |
Key features
n8n
- Visual workflow editor
- AI agent nodes
- Self-hosting
- Code nodes
- 400+ integrations
Make
- Visual scenario builder
- 3,000+ apps
- AI Agents
- Routers and iterators
- Error handling
n8n: pros and cons
Pros
- Self-host for free
- Very flexible for technical users
- Strong AI agent support
Cons
- More technical than Zapier
- Cloud plans limit executions
Make: pros and cons
Pros
- Powerful logic at lower cost than Zapier
- Clear visual debugging
Cons
- Steeper learning curve
- Operation-based billing needs monitoring
Verdict: n8n or Make?
Choose n8n if you're technical teams or automation builders or agencies and value self-host for free.
Choose Make if you're agencies or operations teams or automation consultants and value powerful logic at lower cost than Zapier.
Overall we rate n8n slightly higher. Both are worth trying, and at least one has a free plan or trial. See all Automation & Agents tools for more options.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through links on this page. How we make money.