Automation & Agents comparison 
Make vs Microsoft Power Automate
Our pick: Make scores 8.8/10 against 8.1/10 for Microsoft Power Automate. Here's how they differ and which one fits your needs.
VS
Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft's workflow and RPA platform with Copilot
8.1/10Paid
Visit Microsoft Power Automate At a glance
| Make | Microsoft Power Automate | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 8.8/10 | 8.1/10 |
| Best for | Agencies, Operations teams, Automation consultants | Enterprises, IT teams |
| Type | Workflow automation | Workflow automation |
| Pricing | Free plan | Paid |
| Starting price | $9/mo | See website |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows |
| Launched | 2016 | 2016 |
Key features
Make
- Visual scenario builder
- 3,000+ apps
- AI Agents
- Routers and iterators
- Error handling
Microsoft Power Automate
- Cloud flows
- Desktop RPA
- Copilot flow creation
- Process mining
- Microsoft 365 integration
Make: pros and cons
Pros
- Powerful logic at lower cost than Zapier
- Clear visual debugging
Cons
- Steeper learning curve
- Operation-based billing needs monitoring
Microsoft Power Automate: pros and cons
Pros
- Included in many Microsoft 365 plans
- Strong for Microsoft-centric orgs
Cons
- Licensing is confusing
- Clunky outside Microsoft ecosystem
Verdict: Make or Microsoft Power Automate?
Choose Make if you're agencies or operations teams or automation consultants and value powerful logic at lower cost than Zapier.
Choose Microsoft Power Automate if you're enterprises or it teams and value included in many Microsoft 365 plans.
Overall we rate Make slightly higher. Both are worth trying, and at least one has a free plan or trial. See all Automation & Agents tools for more options.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through links on this page. How we make money.