Healthcare comparison
Noom vs OpenEvidence
Our pick: OpenEvidence scores 8.9/10 against 7.6/10 for Noom. Here's how they differ and which one fits your needs.
VS
At a glance
| Noom | OpenEvidence | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 7.6/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Best for | Weight loss seekers | Physicians, Medical students |
| Type | Fitness & nutrition | Medical research |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting price | See website | Free |
| Platforms | iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Launched | 2008 | 2023 |
Key features
Noom
- Behaviour change lessons
- Food logging
- Coaching
- Medical weight loss
OpenEvidence
- Cited clinical answers
- Journal partnerships
- Mobile app
- Literature synthesis
Noom: pros and cons
Pros
- Focus on habits not just calories
- Well-known brand
- Structured programme
Cons
- Expensive subscription
- Coaching quality varies
OpenEvidence: pros and cons
Pros
- Free for clinicians
- Trusted publisher content
- Very fast adoption
Cons
- Full access requires verification
- Not for patient diagnosis
Verdict: Noom or OpenEvidence?
Choose Noom if you're weight loss seekers and value focus on habits not just calories.
Choose OpenEvidence if you're physicians or medical students and value free for clinicians.
Overall we rate OpenEvidence slightly higher. Both are worth trying, and at least one has a free plan or trial. See all Healthcare tools for more options.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through links on this page. How we make money.